Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMandizha, J
dc.contributor.authorLanario, JW
dc.contributor.authorDuckworth, A
dc.contributor.authorLines, S
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, A
dc.contributor.authorElworthy, V
dc.contributor.authorMuraleedharan, V
dc.contributor.authorDa Ponte, AJ
dc.contributor.authorShuttleworth, R
dc.contributor.authorBrown, G
dc.contributor.authorAlmond, H
dc.contributor.authorBond, C
dc.contributor.authorCosby, M
dc.contributor.authorDallas, J
dc.contributor.authorNaqvi, M
dc.contributor.authorRussell, AD
dc.contributor.authorBerry, A
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, M
dc.contributor.authorScotton, CJ
dc.contributor.authorRussell, A-M
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-31T11:50:37Z
dc.date.available2023-10-31T11:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.identifier.issn2052-4439
dc.identifier.issn2052-4439
dc.identifier.othere001837
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21494
dc.description.abstract

ackground Opportunities for home-monitoring are increasing exponentially. Home- spirometry is reproducible and reliable in interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet patients’ experiences are not reported. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with ILDs, maintaining health-related quality-of-life is vital. We report our findings from a codesigned, qualitative study capturing the perspectives and experiences of patients using home-spirometry in a UK regional ILD National Health Service England (NHSE) commissioned service.

Methods Patients eligible for home-spirometry as routine clinical care, able to give consent and able to access a smart phone were invited to participate. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted at serial time points (baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months), recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results We report on the experiences of 10 recruited patients (8 males; median age 66 years, range 50–82 years; 7 diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 3 other ILDs) who generally found spirometry convenient and easy to use, but their relationships with forced vital capacity results were complex. Main themes emerging were: (1) anticipated benefits—to identify change, trigger action and aid understanding of condition; (2) needs—clinical oversight and feedback, understanding of results, ownership, need for data and a need ‘to know’; (3) emotional impact—worry, reassurance, ambivalence/conflicting feelings, reminder of health issues, indifference; (4) ease of home-spirometry—simplicity, convenience and (5) difficulties with home-spirometry—technical issues, technique, physical effort.

Conclusion Home-spirometry has many benefits, but in view of the potential risks to psychological well-being, must be considered on an individual basis. Informed consent and decision-making are essential and should be ongoing, acknowledging potential limitations as well as benefits. Healthcare support is vital.

dc.format.extente001837-e001837
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.subjectinterstitial fibrosis
dc.subjectpatient outcome assessment
dc.subjectrespiratory function test
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectState Medicine
dc.subjectLung Diseases, Interstitial
dc.subjectIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
dc.subjectSpirometry
dc.subjectVital Capacity
dc.titlePatient perspectives on home-spirometry in interstitial lung disease: a qualitative co-designed study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37793682
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMJ Open Respiratory Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001837
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Post-Graduate Research Students
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|FoH - Community and Primary Care
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-09-01
dc.date.updated2023-10-31T11:50:05Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-11-1
dc.identifier.eissn2052-4439
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001837


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV