Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZavala Quiroga, V.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T15:24:29Z
dc.date.available2023-12-22T15:24:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citation

Zavala Quiroga, V. (2023) 'Diversity, abundance, and distribution of ground invertebrates in Lower Sharpham Farm', The Plymouth Student Scientist, 16(2), pp. 314-346.

en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21835
dc.description.abstract

Invertebrates constitute the largest group of animals on Earth and represent the bulk of biodiversity. They are responsible for numerous essential ecosystems services and are at the centre of many terrestrial food webs. Due to habitat loss from land use change and conversion to intensive agriculture, they are experiencing a substantial decline in biodiversity, hence conservation approaches such as rewilding have been sought. There are limited studies of invertebrate biodiversity in rewilding projects, therefore the aim of this study is to investigate the diversity and abundance of ground invertebrates at Lower Sharpham Farm and the influences of vegetation structure in a rewilded field and a farmed field. 18 pitfall traps were installed in each field divided into 3 groups of 6 and were left outside for 5 days. After collection, 856 invertebrates were found and identified in the laboratory. During that period, a vegetation survey was also carried out. Results within rewilded field indicate that group 1 showed to have a higher invertebrate abundance (n=205) and species richness (n=15) with higher biodiversity index (H=1.88). Results within farmed field indicate that the area in group 1 showed to have a higher invertebrate abundance (n=124) while group 3 had a higher species richness (n=13) with a higher biodiversity index result (H=2.12). Results between fields comparison indicate that rewilded fields increase invertebrate abundance (n=559), though grazing in farmed fields has little effect on invertebrate richness but decreases abundance (n=297). Farmed field had a slightly higher biodiversity index result (H=1.87) compared to rewilded field (H=1.82) due to the high dominance of springtails (Entomobryomorpha). This study determines that rewilding works as a tool for promoting invertebrate abundance and that organic farms have a positive impact on invertebrate diversity. Overall, long-term regular monitoring is needed to evaluate the success of rewilding for biodiversity overtime. The outcomes of the study not only evidence the importance of rewilding for invertebrate conservation but also the importance of low intensive agriculture practices for biodiversity.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectGround invertebrates,en_US
dc.subjectrewildingen_US
dc.subjectorganic farmen_US
dc.subjectinvertebrate biodiversityen_US
dc.subjectinvertebrate conservationen_US
dc.subjectlow intensive agricultureen_US
dc.subjectinvertebrate monitoringen_US
dc.subjectgrazingen_US
dc.subjectecological restorationen_US
dc.titleDiversity, abundance, and distribution of ground invertebrates in Lower Sharpham Farmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume16
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Student Scientist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV