Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFRANCIS‐AUTON, E
dc.contributor.authorLONG, JC
dc.contributor.authorSARKIES, M
dc.contributor.authorROBERTS, N
dc.contributor.authorWESTBROOK, J
dc.contributor.authorLEVESQUE, J
dc.contributor.authorWATSON, DE
dc.contributor.authorHARDWICK, R
dc.contributor.authorHIBBERT, P
dc.contributor.authorPOMARE, C
dc.contributor.authorBRAITHWAITE, J
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T10:50:26Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T10:50:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-25
dc.identifier.issn0887-378X
dc.identifier.issn1468-0009
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21933
dc.description.abstract

Abstract Policy Points The implementation of large-scale health care interventions relies on a shared vision, commitment to change, coordination across sites, and a spanning of siloed knowledge. Enablers of the system should include building an authorizing environment; providing relevant, meaningful, transparent, and timely data; designating and distributing leadership and decision making; and fostering the emergence of a learning culture. Attention to these four enablers can set up a positive feedback loop to foster positive change that can protect against the loss of key staff, the presence of lone disruptors, and the enervating effects of uncertainty. Context Large-scale transformative initiatives have the potential to improve the quality, efficiency, and safety of health care. However, change is expensive, complex, and difficult to implement and sustain. This paper advances system enablers, which will help to guide large-scale transformation in health care systems.

Methods A realist study of the implementation of a value-based health care program between 2017 and 2021 was undertaken in every public hospital (n = 221) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Four data sources were used to elucidate initial program theories beginning with a set of literature reviews, a program document review, and informal discussions with key stakeholders. Semistructured interviews were then conducted with 56 stakeholders to confirm, refute, or refine the theories. A retroductive analysis produced a series of context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) statements. Next, the CMOs were validated with three health care quality expert panels (n = 51). Synthesized data were interrogated to distill the overarching system enablers.

Findings Forty-two CMO statements from the eight initial program theory areas were developed, refined, and validated. Four system enablers were identified: (1) build an authorizing environment; (2) provide relevant, authentic, timely, and meaningful data; (3) designate and distribute leadership and decision making; and (4) support the emergence of a learning culture. The system enablers provide a nuanced understanding of large-system transformation that illustrates when, for whom, and in what circumstances large-system transformation worked well or worked poorly.

Conclusions System enablers offer nuanced guidance for the implementation of large-scale health care interventions. The four enablers may be portable to similar contexts and provide the empirical basis for an implementation model of large-system value-based health care initiatives. With concerted application, these findings can pave the way not just for a better understanding of greater or lesser success in intervening in health care settings but ultimately to contribute higher quality, higher value, and safer care.

dc.format.extent183-211
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectrealist evaluation
dc.subjectorganizational change
dc.subjectinnovation
dc.subjectcomplex adaptive systems
dc.subjectimplementation science
dc.subjecthealth care reform
dc.subjectenablers of transformative change
dc.titleFour System Enablers of Large‐System Transformation in Health Care: A Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38145375
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume102
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12684
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalThe Milbank Quarterly
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-0009.12684
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA|UoA02 Public Health, Health Services and Primary Care
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-11-23
dc.date.updated2024-01-24T10:50:26Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-1-27
dc.identifier.eissn1468-0009
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/1468-0009.12684


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV