Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBishop, R
dc.contributor.authorLaugharne, R
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, L
dc.contributor.authorWard, S
dc.contributor.authorEustice, S
dc.contributor.authorBranford, D
dc.contributor.authorWilcock, M
dc.contributor.authorLamb, K
dc.contributor.authorTavare, A
dc.contributor.authorAnnesley, C
dc.contributor.authorLewis, S
dc.contributor.authorVoulgaropoulos, V
dc.contributor.authorSleeman, F
dc.contributor.authorSargent, B
dc.contributor.authorShankar, R
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-19T18:44:58Z
dc.date.available2024-04-19T18:44:58Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.othere84
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22290
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec id="S2056472424000504_sec_a1"> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Constipation is overrepresented in people with intellectual disabilities. Around 40% of people with intellectual disabilities who died prematurely were prescribed laxatives. A quarter of people with intellectual disabilities are said to be on laxatives. There are concerns that prescribing is not always effective and appropriate. There are currently no prescribing guidelines specific to this population.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472424000504_sec_a2"> <jats:title>Aims</jats:title> <jats:p>To develop guidelines to support clinicians with their decision-making when prescribing laxatives to people with intellectual disabilities.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472424000504_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>A modified Delphi methodology, the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, was used. Step 1 comprised development of a bespoke six-item, open-ended questionnaire from background literature and its external validation. Relevant stakeholders, including a range of clinical experts and experts by experience covering the full range of intellectual disability and constipation, were invited to participate in an expert panel. Panel members completed the questionnaire. Responses were divided into ‘negative consensus’ and ‘positive consensus’. Members were then invited to two panel meetings, 2 weeks apart, held virtually over Microsoft Teams, to build consensus. The expert-by-experience group were included in a separate face-to-face meeting.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472424000504_sec_a4" sec-type="results"> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>A total of 20 people (ten professional experts and ten experts by experience, of whom seven had intellectual disability) took part. There were five main areas of discussion to reach a consensus i.e. importance of diagnosis, the role of prescribing, practicalities of medication administration, importance of reviewing and monitoring, and communication.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472424000504_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusions"> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Laxative prescribing guidelines were developed by synthesising the knowledge of an expert panel including people with intellectual disabilities with the existing evidence base, to improve patient care.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extente84-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherRoyal College of Psychiatrists
dc.subjectCarers
dc.subjectcomorbidity
dc.subjecteducation and training
dc.subjectintellectual disability
dc.subjectpatients
dc.titleLaxative use in adults with intellectual disabilities: development of prescribing guidelines
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38634310
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.50
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalBJPsych Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjo.2024.50
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.date.updated2024-04-19T18:44:58Z
dc.identifier.eissn2056-4724
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1192/bjo.2024.50


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV